The Troll Variations
for a soloist
by
Tom Duff
Reload for a new version!

Instructions

This piece is for a soloist playing any instrument.

Alternate sections are marked Say and Play. The Say sections are spoken or sung to an improvised tune in a stentorian and condescending manner, as a traffic court judge lecturing a recidivist speeder. Read as though the text makes perfect sense, even though its grammar and meaning may make sudden, unexpected turns.

The Play sections use an ordinary five-line staff with oval note heads () interspersed with diamond () and cross () note heads. Play in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.

You can play in concert with other performers, who may play other versions of this piece, or other any other materials, composed or improvised. When playing with others, the Say sections should be performed as disruptively as possible, and the Play sections should be played sensitively, with utmost regard to enhancing the performance of the other players.

Score

Say: Hard to do so.

Play:


Say: Illogical; we haven't performed the Warren Barker arrangement of "Phantom of the orchestra.

Play:




Say: It means "to follow" in a particularly good position from which to look.

Play:


Say: But you don't want to be "classical music", because it's played by a particular composition by a factor of about 5000. What is "coctail chatter"?

Play:




Say: In case it makes a difference, both Sparke and Hart were born in England.

Play:




Say: Precisely.

Play:


Say: On the contrary, you asked a question.

Play:


Say: On the contrary, you made a further posting to which I was the one discussing music.

Play:


Say: But I made a comparison for structure.

Play:


Say: What for you would now play the innocent routine. Of course, given the newsgroup is about. Meanwhile, you've been able to come up with him, not me.

Play:






Say: The key word here is your point with regard to the issue?

Play:


Say: So, you're not in a particularly good position from which to comment, are you?

Play:


Say: On what basis do you make that claim?

Play:


Say: What "name"?

Play:


Say: John who? There are pieces written for orchestra that exclude the string parts were transcribed. Our arrangement was done by adding irrelevant newsgroups.

Play:






Say: On the contrary, the theme is not what this newsgroup is about. That's makes you the one ignoring the evidence for your behavior to anyone who wants it.

Play:




Say: You're mixing comparisons. The Bartok was restricted to who plays the melody of each variation).

Play:




Say: Jazz is not too long.

Play:


Say: You're erroneously presupposing that it is too long for its own good does not indicate any high thoughts about you. Consult your dictionary.

Play:




Say: I'd hardly call your pontification "evidence".

Play:




Say: On the contrary, it's quite relevant.

Play:


Say: The title remains familiar, however, but the explanation is more likely because I have eliminated the possibility that it is too long?

Play:




Say: Balderdash. You're forgetting that I never said he did?

Play:




Say: Actually, nobody has been said to have dictated the length of the members of Blast! were in the discussion of a composer or not?

Play:






Say: Monty Python, anyone?

Play:


Say: Incorrect, as I expected.

Play:


Say: Irrelevant, given that I made a statement indicating awareness of "a number" of masterworks.

Play:




Say: On the contrary, this is rec.music.classical.

Play:


Say: Ah, so you're admitting to being a troll, John? That's not even grammatical.

Play:




Say: It has something to do that, because I didn't write that.

Play: