) interspersed
with diamond (
) and cross (
) note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
Alternate sections are marked Say and Play. The Say sections are spoken or sung to an improvised tune in a stentorian and condescending manner, as a traffic court judge lecturing a recidivist speeder. Read as though the text makes perfect sense, even though its grammar and meaning may make sudden, unexpected turns.
The Play sections use an ordinary five-line staff
with oval note heads () interspersed
with diamond () and cross () note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
) indicates some non-standard noise, like
a multiphonic or a strum behind the bridge or a dropped drumstick or a cheese-grater arpeggio or something else. Use your imagination.
) indicates a note that is one semitone (in either
direction) different from the preceding note.
You can play in concert with other performers, who may play other versions of this piece, or other any other materials, composed or improvised. When playing with others, the Say sections should be performed as disruptively as possible, and the Play sections should be played sensitively, with utmost regard to enhancing the performance of the other players.
Say: Unnecessary, given that neither a troll as bad as you?
Play:
Say: Do you consider to be "masterworks".)
Play:
Say: Non sequitur.
Play:
Say: Well, many of the Rachmaninoff. I made "that one".
Play:
Say: You might want to be "masterworks".)
Play:
Say: On what basis do you make that claim?
Play:
Say: Who might that be?
Play:
Say: Of course, I'm willing to accept my own question. It was Jim Smith's question, and he answered it himself.
Play:
Say: On what basis do you call twelve accordions at the newsgroups line.
Play:
Say: Witness the following example: "No claims will obviate the fact that you take another look at your other responses to me: Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 17:44:38 -0400 Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 18:07:26 -0400 All later. Obviously you didn't answer the question. It was to my posting that your remark is allegedly sequitur, if you saw me quote someone else, which doesn't change the fact that your reply was made.
Play:
Say: Where is this alleged refusal? To refuse to provide information, someone needs to ask for information in the "Fantasy Variations".
Play:
Say: It has something to do that, because I didn't know Holst wasn't born there. Where was he born?
Play:
Say: Therefore I could not have "pissed" on your "parade".
Play:
Say: Repetition of a pontification doesn't make it interesting. At least one record company calls band music as pieces written for orchestra that exclude the string section. Do you instantly go into "dislike mode" whenever an orchestra plays a section of music where the strings aren't playing?
Play:
Say: No, you cannot make such a deduction. My CD library is over a thousand in size, and I've mentioned a liking for a piece is too long?
Play:
Say: Clearly you are not a concert band arrangement.
Play:
Say: Non sequitur.
Play:
Say: Doe hasn't tried.
Play:
Say: But your guess was a good or a bad movie and then wants to lay the blame on the shelves from British concert bands.
Play:
Say: I'd hardly call your pontification "evidence".
Play:
Say: But you can make lemonade out of strikes.
Play:
Say: And you were replying to me. Having listened to is for "Scheherazade", in which the discussion is quite relevant to that judgment.
Play:
Say: On what basis do you call twelve accordions at the bottom of the "Fantasy Variations" to be interesting. A live orchestra performance does not necessarily make it so. Witness the number of repetitions you think they'll stand for.
Play:
Say: Showing your true colors.
Play:
Say: Just more trolling on your "parade".
Play:
Say: Yet more evidence that you could simply dismiss an answer in the same subthread.
Play:
Say: We did "Peter and the much smaller level of traffic in this case is John Doe, who admitted to posting "bait".
Play:
Say: What difference would it make whether I'm a composer or not?
Play:
Say: The address had jbayer in it. What is truly shallow here is one of which was acknowledged as being from someone else, which doesn't change the fact that the Bartok was used as a comparison to two known works to give readers a feeling for the last, which restates the first.
Play:
Say: But I had already done that.
Play: