Alternate sections are marked Say and Play. The Say sections are spoken or sung to an improvised tune in a stentorian and condescending manner, as a traffic court judge lecturing a recidivist speeder. Read as though the text makes perfect sense, even though its grammar and meaning may make sudden, unexpected turns.
The Play sections use an ordinary five-line staff
with oval note heads (
) interspersed
with diamond (
) and cross (
) note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
) indicates some non-standard noise, like
a multiphonic or a strum behind the bridge or a dropped drumstick or a cheese-grater arpeggio or something else. Use your imagination.
) indicates a note that is one semitone (in either
direction) different from the preceding note.
You can play in concert with other performers, who may play other versions of this piece, or other any other materials, composed or improvised. When playing with others, the Say sections should be performed as disruptively as possible, and the Play sections should be played sensitively, with utmost regard to enhancing the performance of the other players.
Say: As opposed to the theme), and I asked you for evidence of my experience?
Play:



































Say: "That many violins."
Play:







Say: "Your" thread?
Play:








Say: I said that the brass bands are a troll? Amazing! Yes, let's show them all what you mean. Some of the members of Blast! were in the Barnes variations. At least one record company calls band music "America's New Classical Music"; it's a bad thing?
Play:






















































































































Say: On the contrary, you were never arrested for posting "bait" here.
Play:

























Say: That would be non sequitur, given your reference to the statement to which I'm replying: Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 18:06:14 -0400 Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 18:06:14 -0400 Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 17:44:38 -0400 Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 17:44:38 -0400 Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 18:07:26 -0400 All later. Obviously you didn't answer my question.
Play:
















































































































































































Say: The theme of Niccolo Paganini represents the "same materials" in this case is John Doe, who admitted to posting "bait".
Play:
















































Say: Not as long as the rest of the members of Blast! were in the discussion wasn't about linear thinking. That's why people should check it out. Too many people seem to be, and I've mentioned a liking for a closer or encore, Paul Hart's "Cartoon" is delightful.
Play:













































































































Say: Note: no response.
Play:









Say: Irrelevant, given that I never said he did?
Play:


















Say: Maybe not to you, but it should be.
Play:











Say: Yet more evidence that you would now play the innocent routine. Of course, given the level of my responses in the comparison is not apt.
Play:









































Say: Of what, allegedly?
Play:














Say: On the contrary, he just admitted to "baiting" me, John. You did the opposite of ignore me. You "baited" me, by your own behavior.
Play:










































Say: Where have I allegedly turn on you?
Play:














Say: You've had plenty of time to jump into a discussion about classical music and hurl some insults.
Play:

























Say: Have you considered the possibility that it "doesn't work". But Blast! is irrelevant here.)
Play:













































Say: Classic invective, as expected from someone else, which doesn't change the fact that my response was in the title "symphony" to indicate length. Meanwhile, a "concerto for orchestra" does indicate that the Moon is made of green cheese."
Play:



























































































Say: That's not something that "decent people" do.
Play:



















Say: Not in the same moment as the object of the time.
Play:

















Say: Evidence, please. Where have I inappropriately used "irrelevant"?
Play:




































Say: On the contrary, it's quite relevant to the work?
Play:

















Say: On the contrary, a transcription is available for concert band.
Play:























Say: Only if within your puking range when he listens to it.
Play:














Say: Where did he provide any facts? He did offer the opinion that the Bartok is much longer than the "Fantasy Variations" "good", and I said nothing about "movements". I said that. I'm still waiting for that evidence.
Play:

























































































Say: The key word here is your looking back through previously read posts.
Play:























Say: I'm sure that no version of Eliza can argue logically.
Play:























Say: On what basis do you make that claim?
Play:














Say: You're presupposing that I'm thinking in a logical sense.
Play:
























Say: Where did he provide any facts? He did say something about irritation, and it's the intonation that is based on the posting to rec.music.compose, including yourself.
Play:

































































