The Troll Variations
for a soloist
by
Tom Duff
Reload for a new version!

Instructions

This piece is for a soloist playing any instrument.

Alternate sections are marked Say and Play. The Say sections are spoken or sung to an improvised tune in a stentorian and condescending manner, as a traffic court judge lecturing a recidivist speeder. Read as though the text makes perfect sense, even though its grammar and meaning may make sudden, unexpected turns.

The Play sections use an ordinary five-line staff with oval note heads () interspersed with diamond () and cross () note heads. Play in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.

You can play in concert with other performers, who may play other versions of this piece, or other any other materials, composed or improvised. When playing with others, the Say sections should be performed as disruptively as possible, and the Play sections should be played sensitively, with utmost regard to enhancing the performance of the other players.

Score

Say: What seems to you is irrelevant, Doe. The facts are relevant.

Play:




Say: Balderdash. You're forgetting that I performed it. The title remains familiar, however, but the explanation is more likely because I didn't say it was "good"?

Play:








Say: Do you consider it to be interesting. A live orchestra performance does not indicate any high thoughts about you. Consult your dictionary.

Play:






Say: Maybe I do understand.

Play:


Say: Just ten lines up: "OK, since tried to use an argument. He simply posted "bait".

Play:




Say: Shorter than Rachmaninoff's "Rhapsody" is much longer than the "Fantasy Variations".

Play:




Say: Irrelevant, given that I've pointed to Bartok, Rachmaninoff, Pudge, Professor Plum, Bill, Jim, and you.

Play:




Say: Incorrect, as I said, hasn't been posting here since a few years ago.

Play:




Say: Have you considered the possibility that it is too long for its own good does not compose music should not write words. I doubt that I made "that one".

Play:






Say: Or his horse Concorde?

Play:


Say: On the contrary, the theme is not apt. You have music to critique?

Play:


Say: Note: no response.

Play:


Say: Gee, so do I.

Play:


Say: Non sequitur; I'm talking about the claim that it's too long.

Play:


Say: Check out James Barnes' "Fantasy Variations on a Theme by Niccolo Paganini".

Play:




Say: Multiple.

Play:


Say: My responses have always been in the "Fantasy Variations".

Play:


Say: It figures that you are not interested in Doe's kookiness. You seem to think of "parades" or "football game halftime shows" whenever "band" is mentioned in such a linear fasion. In reality, I'm thinking linearly, as opposed to logically.

Play:






Say: What alleged "irritability"? I was attending brought in an orchestra plays a section of music where the strings aren't playing?

Play:






Say: Of what, allegedly?

Play:


Say: "What do you make that claim? Don't trot out the irony to you, but you still talking about "Bolero"?

Play:




Say: On your part.

Play:


Say: What appears to you is pontification. It's like watching Siskel and Ebert saying it's a pity that it's too long.

Play:




Say: Gosh, just like Pudge. I said that. I'm still waiting for you would constitute evidence of where I said nothing about "movements". I said that the comparison is restricted to who plays the melody of each variation).

Play:






Say: Glad you agree.

Play:


Say: You should talk, a self-admitted troll.

Play:


Say: Therefore I could not have "pissed" on your "parade".

Play:




Say: What alleged "irritability"? I was replying was crossposted to rec.music.compose, including yourself.

Play:




Say: Or his horse Concorde?

Play:


Say: Witness the number of musicians sitting on the respondent!

Play: