) interspersed
with diamond (
) and cross (
) note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
Alternate sections are marked Say and Play. The Say sections are spoken or sung to an improvised tune in a stentorian and condescending manner, as a traffic court judge lecturing a recidivist speeder. Read as though the text makes perfect sense, even though its grammar and meaning may make sudden, unexpected turns.
The Play sections use an ordinary five-line staff
with oval note heads () interspersed
with diamond () and cross () note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
) indicates some non-standard noise, like
a multiphonic or a strum behind the bridge or a dropped drumstick or a cheese-grater arpeggio or something else. Use your imagination.
) indicates a note that is one semitone (in either
direction) different from the preceding note.
You can play in concert with other performers, who may play other versions of this piece, or other any other materials, composed or improvised. When playing with others, the Say sections should be performed as disruptively as possible, and the Play sections should be played sensitively, with utmost regard to enhancing the performance of the other players.
Say: On the contrary, you were replying to me. See above for the nature of the Rachmaninoff. I made comparisons are both longer.
Play:
Say: Classic invective, as expected from someone who likes such things. Direct complaints accordingly.
Play:
Say: Sort of like how you ignored the evidence for your behavior to anyone who does not qualify as a problem. Just how long each variation is in your posting.
Play:
Say: Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical response. Obviously it was "good"?
Play:
Say: So, you're not in a particularly good position from which to comment, are you?
Play:
Say: Many regard Holst as the famous Rachmaninoff piano work, with the piece, shows an interesting bias on your "parade".
Play:
Say: There are lots of "another thread"s in which the discussion wasn't about linear thinking. That's why people should check it out. Too many people seem to think of "parades" or "football game halftime shows" whenever "band" is mentioned in such a context, yet there is no astrology department at UH.
Play:
Say: Irrelevant, given that I performed it. The title remains familiar, however, but the explanation is more likely because I didn't say it is.
Play:
Say: What alleged "parade"? I haven't tampered with anyone's computer.
Play:
Say: On the contrary, this is rec.music.classical.
Play:
Say: Irrelevant, given that I never said he did?
Play:
Say: You've had plenty of time to post bait, Doe.
Play:
Say: The theme goes through a set of variations was in that same "different subthread".
Play:
Say: Not as long as the "Armenian Dances" (both Parts I and II), and "El Camino Real"? Philip Sparke's "Music for a Festival" is another favorite. For a short opener, Jack Stamp's "Fanfare for a closer or encore, Paul Hart's "Cartoon" is delightful.
Play:
Say: Gosh, just like the Bartok! I said that the variations on that theme are passed around from soloist to soloist or section to section, just as in the negative as being from someone else, then that quotation was in the Star of Indiana drum amd bugle corp. Check out the irony to you, but it should be.
Play:
Say: How convenient.
Play:
Say: But you don't see much on the stage isn't what you find irritating, or else you'd be irritated by the fact that you could simply dismiss an answer in the title "symphony" to indicate length. Meanwhile, a "concerto for orchestra" does indicate that the Bartok a "masterwork", yet each concerto features a different section.
Play:
Say: Where did he provide any facts? He did say something about irritation, and I assume that the trouble may extend to people who have heard of you. Witness the thread titled "Professor Plum Gets Snippy!"
Play:
Say: Missed too much of it during the rest room break.
Play:
Say: Irrelevant, given that we're not dealing with a drum and bugle corp arrangement of "Phantom of the Opera" in years, after having played it to be convinced that antagonists like Doe don't want me to respond. You got what you consider to be perpetrated on the same theme as the father of serious music for that medium.
Play:
Say: Just wanted to make sure. There are multiple people with that name here.
Play:
Say: An illogical question, given that I performed it. The title is familiar; I must have performed it, but too many years ago.
Play:
Say: What, no "taunt", Pudge?
Play:
Say: Incorrect; the news reader had them sorted for me chrologically already, but I didn't say it is.
Play:
Say: The key word here is one of length, and you've done by adding irrelevant newsgroups.
Play:
Say: John who? There are many places in New England that copy names from England.
Play:
Say: I'm still waiting for that matter. However, where were you when Doe first made his off-topic personal attack?
Play:
Say: Well, that depends. If you look at your other responses to me: Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 17:35:27 -0400 Now, let's look at your other responses to me: Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 18:06:14 -0400 Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 17:35:27 -0400 Now, let's look at your other responses to me: Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 17:35:27 -0400 Now, let's look at what you preach and play it on your "parade".
Play:
Say: Still non sequitur.
Play:
Say: We did "Peter and the Wolf" about seven years ago. I'll have to gauge the number of violinists in an orchestra. A single solo would be non sequitur, given your reference to Graham Chapman.
Play: