Alternate sections are marked Say and Play. The Say sections are spoken or sung to an improvised tune in a stentorian and condescending manner, as a traffic court judge lecturing a recidivist speeder. Read as though the text makes perfect sense, even though its grammar and meaning may make sudden, unexpected turns.
The Play sections use an ordinary five-line staff
with oval note heads (
) interspersed
with diamond (
) and cross (
) note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
) indicates some non-standard noise, like
a multiphonic or a strum behind the bridge or a dropped drumstick or a cheese-grater arpeggio or something else. Use your imagination.
) indicates a note that is one semitone (in either
direction) different from the preceding note.
You can play in concert with other performers, who may play other versions of this piece, or other any other materials, composed or improvised. When playing with others, the Say sections should be performed as disruptively as possible, and the Play sections should be played sensitively, with utmost regard to enhancing the performance of the other players.
Say: Does it matter, or are you allegedly speaking for when you say that? Maybe because the trombone section didn't get as lovely a solo as the famous Rachmaninoff piano work, with the Bartok is much longer than the "Fantasy Variations" "good", and I said the theme is not what this newsgroup and the much smaller level of my responses in the aforementioned thread.
Play:






















































































































Say: How so, given that neither a troll as bad as you?
Play:
























Say: Then what is your objective evidence?
Play:
















Say: "Your" thread?
Play:










Say: What for you would constitute evidence of my responses in it.
Play:



















Say: What alleged pontification of mine?
Play:















Say: Composers of band music as pieces written for orchestra that exclude the wind section, so one could consider serious band music "America's New Classical Music"; it's a bad movie and then finally spring "Philip Glass" on them. Usually gets pretty good laugh, if they get that far. You'll have to listen to the "Fantasy Variations".
Play:





































































































































Say: I do. You're the champ of net hypocrites.
Play:

















Say: When it comes to playing games like posting "bait", why don't you find "that many" violins to be irritating? Indeed, my experience has been on every post of mine.
Play:













































































Say: Missed too much of it during the rest of the number of violinists in an orchestra. A single solo would be sufficient to justify the comparison, whereas you have not given any reason for claiming that a good or a bad thing?
Play:






































































Say: To judge its quality for themselves. Or do you get two violists to play that piece and make it interesting. At least one record company calls band music as pieces written for orchestra that exclude the string parts were transcribed. Our arrangement was done by adding irrelevant newsgroups.
Play:



















































































































Say: Again, I dispute that claim, given that the concerto involves the orchestra, so the length of the composer in the negative as being from someone who lacks a logical argument. Also ironic, considering your own admission. I'm doing exactly what you preach and play it on your part.
Play:






































































































Say: The evidence that your claim of speciousness is itself specious.
Play:























Say: Why is that? I play the piano. However, in this case.
Play:





















Say: Let's hope your flurry of emails are directed at Doe's multiple ISPs.
Play:
































Say: Does it matter, or are you tossing in another irrelevancy to be "classical music", but also that others aren't aware of any such cases?
Play:


















































Say: Especially to anyone who does not indicate any high thoughts about you. Consult your dictionary.
Play:






























Say: On what basis do you call it "crap"? Don't trot out the "too long" excuse, given that I didn't say it is.
Play:






































Say: Just beware posters like Doe.
Play:
















Say: I can imagine. All sounds very similar to our organization here.
Play:






















Say: Do you know how long can a violinist go without some rest?
Play:













Say: Note: no response.
Play:










Say: You're welcome.
Play:








Say: Note: no response.
Play:









Say: Or to put it away.
Play:





Say: Illogical, given that the comparison to the collection.
Play:



















Say: Like John Doe.
Play:












Say: I strongly suggest that you take another look at what you preach.
Play:



















Say: I dispute that claim, given that I performed it. The title is familiar; I must have a problem with what you're talking about.
Play:









































Say: Who is Ed Bates and how is a story about him threatening to forbid wind performances of his music because "bands so bastardize it that orchestras will never play it again."
Play:
































































