Alternate sections are marked Say and Play. The Say sections are spoken or sung to an improvised tune in a stentorian and condescending manner, as a traffic court judge lecturing a recidivist speeder. Read as though the text makes perfect sense, even though its grammar and meaning may make sudden, unexpected turns.
The Play sections use an ordinary five-line staff
with oval note heads (
) interspersed
with diamond (
) and cross (
) note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
) indicates some non-standard noise, like
a multiphonic or a strum behind the bridge or a dropped drumstick or a cheese-grater arpeggio or something else. Use your imagination.
) indicates a note that is one semitone (in either
direction) different from the preceding note.
You can play in concert with other performers, who may play other versions of this piece, or other any other materials, composed or improvised. When playing with others, the Say sections should be performed as disruptively as possible, and the Play sections should be played sensitively, with utmost regard to enhancing the performance of the other players.
Say: Go right ahead. But I bet you won't, otherwise you might find yourself out of a composer of classical music" thread.
Play:







































Say: That's twice now that you've posted to do so.
Play:
















Say: The question is still illogical.
Play:










Say: You're erroneously presupposing that the Bartok is even longer.
Play:






















Say: You're erroneously presupposing that I'm a "24/7 jackass". Ironically, you're the one is isn't a "decent person".
Play:












































Say: Are you aware of your act and place the blame on the same theme, or on the same one that Rachmaninoff used for the main cultural event, the organizers of the time.
Play:




















































































Say: On the contrary, it is the appropriate comparison for structure.
Play:
























Say: There is a story about him threatening to forbid wind performances of his music because "bands so bastardize it that orchestras will never play it on your part.
Play:

















































Say: I suggest that you would run away without answering the question.
Play:


















Say: That would be non sequitur, given that we're not dealing with something that "decent people" do. Thus by your own behavior.
Play:





































Say: Now would you care to try for "how" or "why"?
Play:












Say: Incorrect, though after the context has been about American composers yet, despite the newsgroup.
Play:









































Say: The question is still illogical.
Play:








Say: Irrelevant, given that I was there just last August. I've seen the CD in record stores here. But for the entire ensemble, is quite relevant to that judgment.
Play:





























































Say: How so?
Play:




Say: Still non sequitur.
Play:





Say: And throughout the discussion belongs there? I was responding.
Play:

























Say: Yes you did; look at your other responses to me: Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 17:35:27 -0400 Now, let's look at the bottom of the Rachmaninoff. I made it clear that *I* do consider it to be irritating? Indeed, my experience has been that the my discussion of a CD. You have music to critique?
Play:





































































































































Say: Note: no response.
Play:









Say: Note: no response.
Play:











Say: That's your problem.
Play:








Say: Never say never.
Play:











Say: Barnes also uses musical means to vary the theme. Or didn't you notice? Too busy puking?
Play:














































Say: Whose tradition? Mozart's Symphony No. 11 is less then 10 minutes long. Mozart's Symphony No. 11 is less then 10 minutes long. Mozart's Symphony No. 8 is a lie. My name has been that the comparison is not apt. You have music to launch a personal attack, which is it ironic, it's hypocritical.
Play:












































































































Say: Non sequitur.
Play:




Say: Doe's ISP(s).
Play:











Say: I just told you: to calibrate what you consider the "Fantasy Variations" to be convinced.
Play:





































Say: That's twice now that you've posted to do that, because I have yet to substantiate my claim, hence I extracted the relevant section.
Play:






















































Say: Incorrect: the key item is immediately above, namely the attribution; then note the following text OK, since tried to help and you haven't changed your antagonistic attitude.
Play:











































































Say: I invite you to take it up with him, not me.
Play:







