Alternate sections are marked Say and Play. The Say sections are spoken or sung to an improvised tune in a stentorian and condescending manner, as a traffic court judge lecturing a recidivist speeder. Read as though the text makes perfect sense, even though its grammar and meaning may make sudden, unexpected turns.
The Play sections use an ordinary five-line staff
with oval note heads (
) interspersed
with diamond (
) and cross (
) note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
) indicates some non-standard noise, like
a multiphonic or a strum behind the bridge or a dropped drumstick or a cheese-grater arpeggio or something else. Use your imagination.
) indicates a note that is one semitone (in either
direction) different from the preceding note.
You can play in concert with other performers, who may play other versions of this piece, or other any other materials, composed or improvised. When playing with others, the Say sections should be performed as disruptively as possible, and the Play sections should be played sensitively, with utmost regard to enhancing the performance of the other players.
Say: I said nothing about "movements". I said nothing about "movements". I said that you regard this as a problem. Just how long can a violinist go without some rest?
Play:




















































Say: Irrelevant, given that no version of Eliza can argue logically.
Play:
































Say: I haven't been discussing classical music, which is it ironic, it's hypocritical.
Play:































Say: Barnes also uses musical means to vary the theme. Or didn't you notice? Too busy puking?
Play:




























Say: Doe can apparently post his bait about anyone.
Play:






















Say: And how many still perform regularly?
Play:















Say: I said that. I'm still waiting for that medium.
Play:


















Say: I can't impersonate that with which I compared it.
Play:




















Say: On the contrary, the length of the members of Blast! were in the first place. Now, exactly who asked for information?
Play:







































Say: Irrelevant, given that I've been posting here for years. However, the probability of being noticed goes up considerably, and that happens when an antagonist like John Doe decides that it's too long for its own good. In other words, you're a certifiable net.kook.
Play:







































































































Say: Where is this alleged refusal? To refuse to provide information, someone needs to ask for information in the history of the time.
Play:








































Say: You're writing/performing it now.
Play:












Say: On the contrary, it's quite relevant.
Play:


















Say: Many times. Have you?
Play:









Say: Now would you care to try for "how" or "why"?
Play:















Say: No, they were able to articulate their opinions, unlike you.
Play:


















Say: More like getting hit on the wrong person. Interesting that you are.
Play:

























Say: That's your problem.
Play:







Say: Now would you care to try for "how" or "why"?
Play:















Say: Maybe not to you, but it should be.
Play:












Say: You're erroneously presupposing that it is Pudge that is the "right" length. However, as I said, hasn't been posting "far more relevant" responses in the aforementioned thread.
Play:
























































































Say: You're supporting the troll who initiated the problem??? Illogical.
Play:
























Say: Note: no response.
Play:










Say: Actually, I've spelled them correctly, and some of the "Fantasy Variations" to be irritating? Indeed, my experience has been removed, it's hard for readers to determine that.
Play:


















































































Say: That would be you.
Play:








Say: TDAMQ.
Play:








Say: Where did I say it was "good"?
Play:














Say: Evidence that you are mistaken over and over and over, and you turned on you?
Play:
































Say: Again, I dispute that claim, given that you claimed above that Professor Plum's claim is another favorite. For a short opener, Jack Stamp's "Fanfare for a Festival" is another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Play:



























































































Say: Yes you did; look at the first place. Now, exactly who asked for information?
Play:































