) interspersed
with diamond (
) and cross (
) note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
Alternate sections are marked Say and Play. The Say sections are spoken or sung to an improvised tune in a stentorian and condescending manner, as a traffic court judge lecturing a recidivist speeder. Read as though the text makes perfect sense, even though its grammar and meaning may make sudden, unexpected turns.
The Play sections use an ordinary five-line staff
with oval note heads () interspersed
with diamond () and cross () note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
) indicates some non-standard noise, like
a multiphonic or a strum behind the bridge or a dropped drumstick or a cheese-grater arpeggio or something else. Use your imagination.
) indicates a note that is one semitone (in either
direction) different from the preceding note.
You can play in concert with other performers, who may play other versions of this piece, or other any other materials, composed or improvised. When playing with others, the Say sections should be performed as disruptively as possible, and the Play sections should be played sensitively, with utmost regard to enhancing the performance of the other players.
Say: You're welcome.
Play:
Say: But my quotation was in the title "symphony" to indicate length. Meanwhile, a "concerto for orchestra" does indicate that the comparison is not apt. You have attempted to extrapolate by a professional band with good intonation, and tell me how it sounds good, then it IS good."
Play:
Say: Shorter than Rachmaninoff's "Rhapsody" is much longer than the average non-professional wind musician has better intonation than the "Fantasy Variations".
Play:
Say: No, you cannot make such a linear fasion. In reality, I'm thinking in a logical argument.
Play:
Say: On what basis do you make that claim?
Play:
Say: Evidence, please. Where have I allegedly not supported? You recently accused me of calling the "Fantasy Variations" to be "masterworks".)
Play:
Say: Yes you did; look at what you preach.
Play:
Say: Incorrect; my justification is that relevant to this newsgroup?
Play:
Say: No, because it did occur to me. Having listened to is for "Scheherazade", in which the discussion has been said to have dictated the length of the flames and complain about Doe's "bait".
Play:
Say: So is the appropriate comparison for structure.
Play:
Say: Gosh, just like Pudge. I said that the piece was "drivel", but that's hardly a fact.
Play:
Say: In the Bartok, the solo jumps from soloist to soloist or section to section or soloist to soloist or section to section, just as in Bartok (note that the music schools here are turning out performers who are technically first-rate, but have no concept of a CD. You have merely pontificated that the comparison to two known works to give readers a feeling for the "Rhapsody" (note that the Bartok "Concerto for Orchestra".
Play:
Say: I can imagine. All sounds very similar to our organization here.
Play:
Say: On the contrary, you were never arrested for posting "bait" the way John Doe who did that. He's the one discussing American composers. It was to my discussion belongs there? I know what you consider the "Fantasy Variations".
Play:
Say: Still non sequitur.
Play:
Say: Irrelevant, given that the variations jumping from section to section. My reference to the theme), and I assume that the Moon is made of green cheese."
Play:
Say: How is that relevant to this discussion to refer to. Furthermore, who do you call it "crap"? Don't trot out the "too long" excuse, given that I've been posting "far more relevant" responses in the comparison is restricted to who plays the melody of each variation).
Play:
Say: I'm not interested in Doe's kookiness. You seem to think of "parades" or "football game halftime shows" whenever "band" is mentioned in such a linear fasion. In reality, I'm thinking in such a linear fasion. In reality, I'm thinking in such a linear fasion. In reality, I'm thinking in such a linear fasion. In reality, I'm thinking in a logical response. Obviously it was "good"?
Play:
Say: Whose tradition? Mozart's Symphony No. 11 is less then 10 minutes long. Mozart's Symphony No. 8 is a difference between a rhetorical question and rhetoric.
Play:
Say: I'm still waiting for you to check out the irony to you, but it should be.
Play:
Say: Why?
Play:
Say: If the previous material was irrelevant, then why did you answer your own admission. I'm doing exactly what you wanted.
Play:
Say: On your part.
Play:
Say: About John Doe.
Play:
Say: You're presupposing that I'm a "24/7 jackass". Ironically, you're the one ignoring the evidence so that an argument can be perpetuated.
Play:
Say: The other two what?
Play:
Say: What alleged "pissing"? What alleged "parade"? I haven't suggested that everyone here listen.
Play:
Say: Just wanted to make sure. There are multiple people with that name here.
Play:
Say: You've had plenty of time to post bait, Doe.
Play:
Say: On the contrary, the length of another piece that occupies one fifth of a "mood play".
Play: