) interspersed
with diamond (
) and cross (
) note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
Alternate sections are marked Say and Play. The Say sections are spoken or sung to an improvised tune in a stentorian and condescending manner, as a traffic court judge lecturing a recidivist speeder. Read as though the text makes perfect sense, even though its grammar and meaning may make sudden, unexpected turns.
The Play sections use an ordinary five-line staff
with oval note heads () interspersed
with diamond () and cross () note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
) indicates some non-standard noise, like
a multiphonic or a strum behind the bridge or a dropped drumstick or a cheese-grater arpeggio or something else. Use your imagination.
) indicates a note that is one semitone (in either
direction) different from the preceding note.
You can play in concert with other performers, who may play other versions of this piece, or other any other materials, composed or improvised. When playing with others, the Say sections should be performed as disruptively as possible, and the Play sections should be played sensitively, with utmost regard to enhancing the performance of the other players.
Say: The Bartok is the "Fantasy Variations" to be "masterworks".)
Play:
Say: Illogical, as antagonists like you don't realize how your remark was directed at me?
Play:
Say: I said that the visual aspect of the number of musicians sitting on the concert band". Apparently you didn't answer the question. It was JD. As in John Doe.
Play:
Say: Whose, yours?
Play:
Say: It's hard to figure out people like Doe.
Play:
Say: But my quotation was in the title "symphony" to indicate length. Meanwhile, a "concerto for orchestra" does indicate that the Bartok "Concerto for Orchestra", to which I'm replying: Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 17:44:38 -0400 Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 18:07:26 -0400 All later. Obviously you didn't answer the question. It figures.
Play:
Say: Incorrect; it is the appropriate comparison for melody.
Play:
Say: That's your problem, given that you think "chicken s**t" is an adequate substitute for lemons.
Play:
Say: You didn't exercise that option, as I just pointed out with you and other kooks?
Play:
Say: Note: no response.
Play:
Say: Doe cannot win an argument with me because he hasn't identified where it is too long?
Play:
Say: Then what is your looking back through previously read posts.
Play:
Say: Readers take note: Carter is someone who uses two different names?
Play:
Say: Irrelevant, given that the messages to which I'm responding to you. Too bad that others aren't aware of your act and place the blame on the posting to rec.music.compose, including yourself.
Play:
Say: The question is still illogical.
Play:
Say: Sort of like how you ignored the evidence for your behavior to anyone who reads your postings.
Play:
Say: It was to my posting that your reply was made.
Play:
Say: OT could mean "on topic", or "overtime" for that evidence.
Play:
Say: You've had plenty of time to post bait, Doe.
Play:
Say: What for you would run away without answering the question.
Play:
Say: Sort of like how you ignored the evidence for your behavior to anyone who reads your postings.
Play:
Say: Irrelevant, given that I already proved once.
Play:
Say: You didn't provide an answer; rather, you asked a question.
Play:
Say: Yes.
Play:
Say: So, using your reasoning, anyone who reads your postings.
Play:
Say: Doe's ISP(s).
Play:
Say: Just because one person can claim that I never said he did?
Play:
Say: On what basis do you speak for when you need him to write the First and Second Suites for Military Band around 1909. Vaughan Williams followed in his follow-up; rhetorical questions are not a "decent person".
Play:
Say: The fact that you didn't answer my own evaluation of myself?
Play:
Say: Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Play: