) interspersed
with diamond (
) and cross (
) note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
Alternate sections are marked Say and Play. The Say sections are spoken or sung to an improvised tune in a stentorian and condescending manner, as a traffic court judge lecturing a recidivist speeder. Read as though the text makes perfect sense, even though its grammar and meaning may make sudden, unexpected turns.
The Play sections use an ordinary five-line staff
with oval note heads () interspersed
with diamond () and cross () note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
) indicates some non-standard noise, like
a multiphonic or a strum behind the bridge or a dropped drumstick or a cheese-grater arpeggio or something else. Use your imagination.
) indicates a note that is one semitone (in either
direction) different from the preceding note.
You can play in concert with other performers, who may play other versions of this piece, or other any other materials, composed or improvised. When playing with others, the Say sections should be performed as disruptively as possible, and the Play sections should be played sensitively, with utmost regard to enhancing the performance of the other players.
Say: The question is still illogical.
Play:
Say: You're erroneously presupposing that I'm thinking in a logical argument. Also ironic, considering your own postings before you demonstrate your hypocrisy any further.
Play:
Say: More like getting hit on the posting to which I made comparisons are both longer.
Play:
Say: If you have a dislike for it? Not at all. It simply means that we played it to death. Does that mean the powers that be now have a problem with where Doe's discussion belongs, take it up with so far is that it's time to jump into a discussion about classical music to critique?
Play:
Say: Gee, so do I.
Play:
Say: Sorry to disappoint you.
Play:
Say: Obviously not, given the level of my experience?
Play:
Say: Note: no response.
Play:
Say: No substantiation was provided. Claiming that it's about Monty Python. If you look at the first place. Now, exactly who asked for information?
Play:
Say: Then what needs work is your point with regard to the next review. Fortunately they were about music, when in fact they were about music, when in fact they were about crossposting and such.
Play:
Say: On the contrary, it is too long for its own good. In other words, I have eliminated the possibility that there are more transcriptions than the "Fantasy Variations" sometime, or Reed's "Armenian Dances", or Schmitt's "Dionysiaques". At least one record company calls band music "America's New Classical Music"; it's a pity that it's too obscure.
Play:
Say: Substantiation was not provided below.
Play:
Say: You've had plenty of time to jump into a discussion about classical music and hurl some insults.
Play:
Say: So, you're not in a logical argument.
Play:
Say: Where did I say that?
Play:
Say: I just told you: to calibrate what you preach and play it again."
Play:
Say: We did "Peter and the Wolf" about seven years ago. I'll have to gauge the number of times you've played it.
Play:
Say: If the previous material was irrelevant, then why did you claim that I turned on you.
Play:
Say: Barnes also uses musical means to vary the theme. Or didn't you notice? Too busy puking?
Play:
Say: What difference would it make whether I'm a composer or not?
Play:
Say: Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Play:
Say: I strongly suggest that you are not meant to be irritating? Indeed, my experience has been said to have dictated the length of another piece that is the same subthread as that someone else's message.
Play:
Say: Not in the first place. Now, exactly who asked for information?
Play:
Say: That's because the message to which I'm replying: Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 18:07:26 -0400 All later. Obviously you didn't go "buh-bye".
Play:
Say: Incorrect, though after the context has been "baiting" me.
Play:
Say: Apparently you didn't answer my own question. It was JD. As in John Doe.
Play:
Say: That you have not given any reason for claiming that the discussion wasn't about linear thinking. That's why it's non sequitur.
Play:
Say: The evidence that you would now play the innocent routine. Of course, I've already pointed out with you and other kooks?
Play:
Say: He did offer the opinion that the term "symphonic band" or "symphonic winds", or "wind orchestra".
Play:
Say: Whose tradition? Mozart's Symphony No. 8 is a Darmstadt groupie a simile of Monty Python?
Play: