Instructions

Alternate sections are marked Say and Play. The Say sections are spoken or sung to an improvised tune in a stentorian and condescending manner, as a traffic court judge lecturing a recidivist speeder. Read as though the text makes perfect sense, even though its grammar and meaning may make sudden, unexpected turns.

The Play sections use an ordinary five-line staff with oval note heads () interspersed with diamond () and cross () note heads. Play in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.

• I've used bar lines set off groups of notes. Groups should be observed by accent, phrasing, pauses or some other way.
• The cross () indicates some non-standard noise, like a multiphonic or a strum behind the bridge or a dropped drumstick or a cheese-grater arpeggio or something else. Use your imagination.
• The diamond () indicates a note that is one semitone (in either direction) different from the preceding note.
• Rhythm, tempo and dynamics are entirely up to the performer. Since no clef is specified, you can pick that as well.

You can play in concert with other performers, who may play other versions of this piece, or other any other materials, composed or improvised. When playing with others, the Say sections should be performed as disruptively as possible, and the Play sections should be played sensitively, with utmost regard to enhancing the performance of the other players.

Score

Say: Why would I want to advertise to the Rachmaninoff is the non-OS/2 users that hang out in the aforementioned thread.

Play:

Say: How so, given that universities do more than just a "try". I succeeding in shooting down your argument.

Play:

Say: Note: no response.

Play:

Say: Just wanted to make sure. There are many places in New England that copy names from England.

Play:

Say: I haven't been discussing anything with you.

Play:

Say: We did "Peter and the much smaller level of traffic in this particular case, the appearance is courtesy of John Doe, who admitted to posting "bait".

Play:

Say: Actually, I've spelled them correctly, and some of those uses have been in response to my posting that your reply was made.

Play:

Say: I do. You're the champ of net hypocrites.

Play:

Say: Orbital eccentricity. I've also observed a lot of human eccentricity.

Play:

Say: Doe can apparently post his bait about anyone.

Play:

Say: I suggest you listen to the latter, as the former is irrelevant to this newsgroup?

Play:

Say: Ah, so the powers that be do not share your dislike for it.

Play:

Say: Threats are irrelevant. Hypocrites don't get very far.

Play:

Say: Just ten lines up: "OK, since tried to help and you haven't said anything about American composers, choosing instead to discuss the issue that I never claimed that Rach's is the same moment as the "Armenian Dances" (both Parts I and II), and "El Camino Real"? Philip Sparke's "Music for a New Era" is wonderful. And for a Festival" is another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Play:

Say: The theme of Niccolo Paganini represents the "same materials" in this discussion is occurring.

Play:

Say: Where did he provide any facts? He did offer the opinion that the Bartok is the appropriate comparison for melody.

Play:

Say: Sorry to disappoint you.

Play:

Say: Classic pontification.

Play:

Say: On the contrary, I do understand.

Play:

Say: Where did he provide any facts? He did offer the opinion that the source of irritation is intonation. If that's incorrect, feel free to explain your crossposting?

Play:

Say: Just because one person can claim that the visual aspect of the format, but rather the musicians. Good intonation is possible.

Play:

Say: You're erroneously presupposing that it's too obscure.

Play:

Say: Incorrect: the key item is immediately above, namely the attribution; then note the absence of any substantiation from you.

Play:

Say: It figures that you didn't go "buh-bye".

Play:

Say: You're erroneously presupposing that I never said that the concerto involves the orchestra, so the powers that be do not share your dislike for it? Not at all. It simply means that we played it to be pointlessly argumentative?

Play:

Say: That would be you.

Play:

Say: I haven't suggested that everyone here listen.

Play:

Say: Why should it be the other way around? The music itself is inanimate; it won't have any trouble hearing the minor mistake by the Dallas Wind Symphony with Frederick Fennell conducting.

Play:

Say: I've seen the PBS video of the movement at the bottom of the orchestra.

Play:

Say: Do you know how long each variation is in the title either!

Play: