The Troll Variations
for a soloist
by
Tom Duff
Reload for a new version!

Instructions

This piece is for a soloist playing any instrument.

Alternate sections are marked Say and Play. The Say sections are spoken or sung to an improvised tune in a stentorian and condescending manner, as a traffic court judge lecturing a recidivist speeder. Read as though the text makes perfect sense, even though its grammar and meaning may make sudden, unexpected turns.

The Play sections use an ordinary five-line staff with oval note heads () interspersed with diamond () and cross () note heads. Play in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.

You can play in concert with other performers, who may play other versions of this piece, or other any other materials, composed or improvised. When playing with others, the Say sections should be performed as disruptively as possible, and the Play sections should be played sensitively, with utmost regard to enhancing the performance of the other players.

Score

Say: Illogical, given that we're not dealing with something that "decent people" do. Thus by your own standards, you shouldn't be here. Classic hypocrisy.

Play:






Say: Irrelevant, given that I performed it. The title is familiar; I must have performed it, but too many years ago.

Play:




Say: How is that the discussion wasn't about linear thinking. That's why it's non sequitur.

Play:


Say: That would be non sequitur, given that I never said he did?

Play:


Say: I haven't suggested that everyone here listen.

Play:




Say: What for you would constitute evidence of where I said that a piece is too long?

Play:




Say: Feel free to identify where it is Pudge that is the usual cause. What else could it be? The visual impact of a concerto for orchestra.

Play:






Say: Maybe not to you, but it should be.

Play:


Say: Illogical; we haven't performed the Warren Barker arrangement of Bolero, not a concert band.

Play:




Say: Do you consider to be irritating? Indeed, my experience has been removed, it's hard for readers to determine that.

Play:






Say: Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Play:


Say: Sort of like how you intend to explain how your remark is allegedly "quite meaningless"?

Play:




Say: Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Play:


Say: Then what is your looking back through previously read posts.

Play:


Say: On what basis do you make that claim?

Play:


Say: How about the "Symphonic Overture" or "Visions Macabre"?

Play:


Say: How ironic, coming from the person who has never heard of you. How ironic.

Play:


Say: You could use a typewriter. Leroy Anderson did.

Play:


Say: So why did you claim that I never said that you didn't answer the question. It figures.

Play:




Say: Showing your true colors.

Play:


Say: On what basis do you make that claim?

Play:


Say: Where did I allegedly not substantiated?

Play:


Say: That's not something that "decent people" do. Thus by your own admission. I'm doing exactly what you wanted.

Play:




Say: On the contrary, this is rec.music.classical.

Play:


Say: Where did the "[Duh]" come from, John? You've attributed it to death. Does that mean the powers that be do not share the dislike that some do at least one. Wouldn't be surprised if there were others. Some transcribers will do a watered-down version for younger musicians.

Play:










Say: "If it sounds different.

Play:


Say: Be my guest, if you think I posted.

Play:


Say: Showing your true colors.

Play:


Say: On the contrary, he just admitted to not knowing much about the length, yet the two pieces to which I was the lack of serious music for them that their aliens from outer space story was fiction. Would you expect them to back down?

Play:






Say: I didn't say it was "good"?

Play: