Alternate sections are marked Say and Play. The Say sections are spoken or sung to an improvised tune in a stentorian and condescending manner, as a traffic court judge lecturing a recidivist speeder. Read as though the text makes perfect sense, even though its grammar and meaning may make sudden, unexpected turns.
The Play sections use an ordinary five-line staff
with oval note heads (
) interspersed
with diamond (
) and cross (
) note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
) indicates some non-standard noise, like
a multiphonic or a strum behind the bridge or a dropped drumstick or a cheese-grater arpeggio or something else. Use your imagination.
) indicates a note that is one semitone (in either
direction) different from the preceding note.
You can play in concert with other performers, who may play other versions of this piece, or other any other materials, composed or improvised. When playing with others, the Say sections should be performed as disruptively as possible, and the Play sections should be played sensitively, with utmost regard to enhancing the performance of the other players.
Say: What difference would it make whether I'm a "24/7 jackass". Ironically, you're the one you heard?
Play:












































Say: Incorrect; the news reader had them sorted for me chrologically already, but I needed evidence to substantiate any of his music because "bands so bastardize it that orchestras will never play it on your part.
Play:


































































































Say: I'm sure that some do at least some of the ocean?" "A good start."
Play:








































Say: Where did I allegedly turn on you?
Play:
















Say: On the contrary, it was John Doe did.
Play:















Say: The source is also incorrect. How gullible you are.
Play:

















Say: Again, I dispute that claim, given that the Bartok is much longer than the one who called the Bartok is even longer.
Play:













































Say: Jazz is not what this newsgroup is about. Meanwhile, you've been able to come up with Doe.
Play:

































Say: Incorrect.
Play:






Say: Okay, Professor Plum, who, as I recall. Certainly didn't have "Variations" in the Barnes variations are too long.
Play:











































Say: Why is that? I play the piano. However, in this discussion?
Play:
















Say: Readers take note: Carter is someone who jumped into a discussion about classical music to critique?
Play:



































Say: Undoing the damage you've done nothing to support Pudge's notion that the visual aspect of the time.
Play:






































Say: I compared the *structure* to the issue?
Play:
















Say: I've seen the PBS video. Packed London house.
Play:



























Say: Star Spangled? Stars and Stripes? Anchors Aweigh? Semper Fi?
Play:






























Say: You're presupposing that it "doesn't work". But Blast! is irrelevant here.)
Play:


































Say: Why should I?
Play:




Say: Just wanted to make sure. There are multiple people with that name here.
Play:



























Say: On what basis do you make that claim?
Play:
















Say: I was there just last August. I've seen the CD in record stores here. But for the nature of the flames and complain about Doe's "bait".
Play:






































































Say: How ironic, coming from the person who has yet to substantiate my claim, hence I extracted the relevant section.
Play:











































Say: That's your justification for calling another work "stupid"! You're internally inconsistent!
Play:




























Say: That you have some musically-inclined friends who don't mind a little knock-knock joke, try "knock knock" "who's there" about twenty times (if they'll even play along that long) and then wants to lay the blame on the concert band". Apparently you have your attributions confused.
Play:






































































































Say: Once again, you're mixing comparisons.
Play:





















Say: Have you listened to the original discussion?
Play:














Say: Why?
Play:



Say: That's a single instrument, not an orchestra. It's logical to assume that the Bartok "Concerto for Orchestra". Of course, I already have. Where have I inappropriately used "irrelevant"?
Play:

































































































Say: The fact that you claimed above that Professor Plum's postings were about crossposting and such. I was attending brought in an orchestra. A single solo would be you.
Play:




































































Say: You're writing/performing it now.
Play:













