) interspersed
with diamond (
) and cross (
) note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
Alternate sections are marked Say and Play. The Say sections are spoken or sung to an improvised tune in a stentorian and condescending manner, as a traffic court judge lecturing a recidivist speeder. Read as though the text makes perfect sense, even though its grammar and meaning may make sudden, unexpected turns.
The Play sections use an ordinary five-line staff
with oval note heads () interspersed
with diamond () and cross () note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
) indicates some non-standard noise, like
a multiphonic or a strum behind the bridge or a dropped drumstick or a cheese-grater arpeggio or something else. Use your imagination.
) indicates a note that is one semitone (in either
direction) different from the preceding note.
You can play in concert with other performers, who may play other versions of this piece, or other any other materials, composed or improvised. When playing with others, the Say sections should be performed as disruptively as possible, and the Play sections should be played sensitively, with utmost regard to enhancing the performance of the other players.
Say: On what basis do you claim that the variations on that theme are passed around from soloist to soloist or section to section or soloist to soloist or section to section or soloist to soloist or section to section. My reference to the work also do not share your dislike for it? Not at all. It simply means that we played it death and have other things in our library.
Play:
Say: Incorrect, though after the context has been that the source of irritation.
Play:
Say: Doe can apparently post his bait about anyone.
Play:
Say: I invite you to take this discussion is occurring.
Play:
Say: Why would I want to advertise to the next review. Fortunately they were about music, when in fact they were able to articulate their opinions, unlike you.
Play:
Say: It means "to follow" in a particularly good position from which to look.
Play:
Say: You're presupposing that the Barnes variations are too long.
Play:
Say: The address had jbayer in it. What is "coctail chatter"?
Play:
Say: But you can make lemonade out of a CD. You have attempted to extrapolate by a particular composition by a factor of about 5000. What is truly shallow here is "if".
Play:
Say: I see that you are mistaken, and you turned on you?
Play:
Say: That's your problem.
Play:
Say: That you don't see much on the same melody over and over. It's a real challenge to play in tune? You shoot one of them.
Play:
Say: Rachmaninoff's "Rhapsody" is much longer than that, yet Pudge called it a masterwork. Obviously 2 minutes is not that it's time to jump into a discussion about classical music to critique?
Play:
Say: Different theme; the Rachmaninoff "Rhapsody".
Play:
Say: You're presupposing that I never claimed that Rach's is the appropriate comparison for structure.
Play:
Say: But my quotation was in that same "different subthread".
Play:
Say: Which part of my experience?
Play:
Say: It was JD. As in John Doe.
Play:
Say: You're welcome.
Play:
Say: Many times. Have you?
Play:
Say: Note: no response.
Play:
Say: Irrelevant, given that the my discussion belongs in alt.usenet.kooks. If you look at the newsgroups line.
Play:
Say: Therefore I could not have "pissed" on your part.
Play:
Say: On the contrary, it was John Doe did.
Play:
Say: Note: no response.
Play:
Say: Well, you can make lemonade out of lemons.
Play:
Say: There is no such composition.
Play:
Say: Apparently you have your attributions confused.
Play:
Say: On the contrary, a transcription is available for concert bands. Professional groups of either kind shouldn't sound irritating, though I'm sure that no version of Eliza can argue logically.
Play:
Say: Composers of band music "America's New Classical Music"; it's a fact doesn't necessarily make it so. That you don't want to reconsider your own question if it wasn't rhetorical? You ask the guy question. Answer it yourself. Sure sounded like rhetoric to me.
Play: