Instructions

Alternate sections are marked Say and Play. The Say sections are spoken or sung to an improvised tune in a stentorian and condescending manner, as a traffic court judge lecturing a recidivist speeder. Read as though the text makes perfect sense, even though its grammar and meaning may make sudden, unexpected turns.

The Play sections use an ordinary five-line staff with oval note heads () interspersed with diamond () and cross () note heads. Play in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.

• I've used bar lines set off groups of notes. Groups should be observed by accent, phrasing, pauses or some other way.
• The cross () indicates some non-standard noise, like a multiphonic or a strum behind the bridge or a dropped drumstick or a cheese-grater arpeggio or something else. Use your imagination.
• The diamond () indicates a note that is one semitone (in either direction) different from the preceding note.
• Rhythm, tempo and dynamics are entirely up to the performer. Since no clef is specified, you can pick that as well.

You can play in concert with other performers, who may play other versions of this piece, or other any other materials, composed or improvised. When playing with others, the Say sections should be performed as disruptively as possible, and the Play sections should be played sensitively, with utmost regard to enhancing the performance of the other players.

Score

Say: No, you cannot make such a context, yet there is summer session.

Play:

Say: Clearly you are not interested in any serious discussion here.

Play:

Say: Because there is summer session.

Play:

Say: Only if within your puking range when he listens to it.

Play:

Say: The other two what?

Play:

Say: Rachmaninoff's "Rhapsody" and shorter than Bartok's "Concerto for Orchestra".

Play:

Say: It has something to do nothing but make personal attacks. I've been able to come up with him.

Play:

Say: How ironic, coming from the person ignoring the evidence for your behavior to anyone who reads your postings.

Play:

Say: Incorrect; it is too long for its own good does not guarantee that the piece didn't have "Variations" in the first line above, it looks like it's about Ed Casey's erroneous warning. If you look at your other responses to me: Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 18:06:14 -0400 Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 17:35:27 -0400 Now, let's look at the same presupposition.

Play:

Say: One of the "Fantasy Variations".

Play:

Say: Composers of band music as pieces written for orchestra that exclude the string parts were transcribed. Our arrangement was done by adding irrelevant newsgroups.

Play:

Say: Enlightenment comes from different orchestration. Take the exact same orchestration and have other things in our library.

Play:

Say: Gee, so do I.

Play:

Say: Whose tradition? Mozart's Symphony No. 8 is a story about him threatening to forbid wind performances of his arguments!

Play:

Say: On the contrary, you're the one who brought up irritation.

Play:

Say: What for you would run away without answering the question.

Play:

Say: Classic pontification.

Play:

Say: The fact that my response is appearing there as well.

Play:

Say: May I recommend some of those uses have been in response to Professor Plum, you've demonstrated that you don't see much on the wrong person. Interesting that you don't have a dislike for it.

Play:

Say: The title remains familiar, however, but the explanation is more likely because I didn't choose the original distribution. However, note that the Bartok a "masterwork", yet each concerto features a different section! That's your problem, given that I never said he did?

Play:

Say: Composers of band music do not share the dislike that some of those uses have been in the title "symphony" to indicate length. Meanwhile, a "concerto for orchestra" does indicate that the comparison is not something that "decent people" do. Thus by your own standards, you shouldn't be here. Classic hypocrisy.

Play:

Say: How so, given that I turned on me..."

Play:

Say: Why should it be the other way around? The music itself is inanimate; it won't have any trouble hearing the minor mistake by the large number of repetitions you think I posted.

Play:

Say: Of what, allegedly?

Play:

Say: Also irrelevant.

Play:

Say: Showing your true colors.

Play:

Say: Evidence, please.

Play:

Say: Obviously not, given the newsgroup is about. That's makes you the one claiming that a good one.

Play:

Say: There is no such composition.

Play:

Say: Evidence, please. Where have I inappropriately used "irrelevant"?

Play: