Alternate sections are marked Say and Play. The Say sections are spoken or sung to an improvised tune in a stentorian and condescending manner, as a traffic court judge lecturing a recidivist speeder. Read as though the text makes perfect sense, even though its grammar and meaning may make sudden, unexpected turns.
The Play sections use an ordinary five-line staff
with oval note heads (
) interspersed
with diamond (
) and cross (
) note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
) indicates some non-standard noise, like
a multiphonic or a strum behind the bridge or a dropped drumstick or a cheese-grater arpeggio or something else. Use your imagination.
) indicates a note that is one semitone (in either
direction) different from the preceding note.
You can play in concert with other performers, who may play other versions of this piece, or other any other materials, composed or improvised. When playing with others, the Say sections should be performed as disruptively as possible, and the Play sections should be played sensitively, with utmost regard to enhancing the performance of the other players.
Say: Famous last words.
Play:










Say: Because there is some fantastic music for concert band.
Play:




























Say: I just pointed out with the term does not guarantee that the piece didn't have any reaction to how the variation jumps from instrument to instrument or section to section or soloist to soloist or section to section as in Bartok (note that the Bartok is even longer.
Play:



























































Say: Witness the thread titled "Professor Plum Gets Snippy!"
Play:























Say: We did "Peter and the Wolf" about seven years ago. I'll have to listen to the recording to refresh my memory about how the string parts were transcribed. Our arrangement was done by adding irrelevant newsgroups.
Play:













































































Say: How so?
Play:



Say: There is a lie. My name has been "baiting" me.
Play:

























Say: Witness the following example: "No claims will obviate the fact that my response was in the Star of Indiana drum amd bugle corp. Check out the "too long" excuse, given that I never claimed that Rach's is the "right" length. However, as I said, hasn't been posting here since a few years ago.
Play:






































































































































Say: What might that be?
Play:








Say: You're supporting the troll who initiated the problem??? Illogical.
Play:






















Say: What is "coctail chatter"?
Play:


















Say: The Bartok was restricted to the original distribution. However, note that the variations jumping from section to section. My reference to the world that you could simply dismiss an answer in the Star of Indiana drum amd bugle corp. Check out the "too long" excuse, given that I never claimed that Rach's is the same theme, or on the respondent!
Play:

















































































































Say: Still based on the same one that Rachmaninoff used for the "Rhapsody" (note that the trouble may extend to people who program the work also do not use strings constantly. What most composers over the centuries have done is biased by the large number of repetitions you think you can.
Play:
















































































































Say: As opposed to logically.
Play:













Say: On the contrary, you asked to be "classical music", because it's played by a particular composition by a concert band arrangement.
Play:
























































Say: That isn't "a" word, and I'm also already familiar with an example of one.
Play:













































Say: The other two what?
Play:







Say: Well, you can make lemonade out of a composer or not?
Play:



















Say: Incorrect, given that the variations jumping from section to section as in Bartok (note that the concerto involves the orchestra, so the newsgroup in which the discussion belongs there? I was attending brought in an orchestra. A single solo would be non sequitur, given your reference to Graham Chapman.
Play:











































































































Say: In case it makes a difference, both Sparke and Hart were born in England.
Play:

































Say: I suggest that people aim their fire extinguisher at the same presupposition.
Play:

























Say: The troll in this discussion?
Play:








Say: Let's hope your flurry of emails are directed at Doe's multiple ISPs.
Play:

























Say: One suggestion: quit posting "bait".
Play:
















Say: Illogical, as antagonists like you don't want me to go away, Doe. You intentionally posted bait. You wanted me to respond. You got what you preach and play it again."
Play:






























































Say: Okay, Professor Plum, Bill, Jim, and you.
Play:

















Say: What for you would now play the piano. However, in this case.
Play:

















Say: TDAMQ.
Play:







Say: It's not your choice. History has already portrayed you as someone who jumped into a discussion about classical music and hurl some insults.
Play:







































Say: Be my guest, if you think I posted.
Play:















