Instructions

Alternate sections are marked Say and Play. The Say sections are spoken or sung to an improvised tune in a stentorian and condescending manner, as a traffic court judge lecturing a recidivist speeder. Read as though the text makes perfect sense, even though its grammar and meaning may make sudden, unexpected turns.

The Play sections use an ordinary five-line staff with oval note heads () interspersed with diamond () and cross () note heads. Play in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.

• I've used bar lines set off groups of notes. Groups should be observed by accent, phrasing, pauses or some other way.
• The cross () indicates some non-standard noise, like a multiphonic or a strum behind the bridge or a dropped drumstick or a cheese-grater arpeggio or something else. Use your imagination.
• The diamond () indicates a note that is one semitone (in either direction) different from the preceding note.
• Rhythm, tempo and dynamics are entirely up to the performer. Since no clef is specified, you can pick that as well.

You can play in concert with other performers, who may play other versions of this piece, or other any other materials, composed or improvised. When playing with others, the Say sections should be performed as disruptively as possible, and the Play sections should be played sensitively, with utmost regard to enhancing the performance of the other players.

Score

Say: I dispute that claim, given that you think is irrelevant.

Play:

Say: Where did I allegedly not substantiated?

Play:

Say: I know that the my discussion of a competitive ethos, or the competitive ethos? Depends on whether the "no" is included as the famous Rachmaninoff piano work, with the term does not necessarily make it any less of a composer or not?

Play:

Say: One of the composer in the OS/2 newsgroups and try to spread their FUD that are the nuisance.

Play:

Say: The evidence that your remark was directed at Doe's multiple ISPs.

Play:

Say: Why is that? I play the piano. However, in this case.

Play:

Say: How so, given that I never said it is. My comparison with the piece, shows an interesting bias on your acoustic piano?

Play:

Say: How so?

Play:

Say: After a fashion.

Play:

Say: The theme of Niccolo Paganini represents the "same materials" in this newsgroup is about. Meanwhile, you've been able to get from you is irrelevant; the facts are relevant.

Play:

Say: On what basis do you claim that I already told you that you would constitute evidence of my experience?

Play:

Say: Your memory needs some work.

Play:

Say: Non sequitur, given that I was replying was crossposted to rec.music.compose. I didn't say it is.

Play:

Say: So, you're not in a logical argument.

Play:

Say: Classic pontification.

Play:

Say: That is a lie. My name has been on every post of mine.

Play:

Say: We did "Peter and the much smaller level of my experience?

Play:

Say: Yet another error in attribution.

Play:

Say: Actually, nobody has been removed, it's hard for readers to determine that.

Play:

Say: There is a Darmstadt groupie a simile of Monty Python?

Play:

Say: In the definition.

Play:

Say: Okay, Professor Plum, who, as I expected.

Play:

Say: You said something about irritation, and I said that. I'm still waiting for that evidence.

Play:

Say: Gosh, so does Barnes.

Play:

Say: You should, because Pudge complained about the audience.

Play:

Say: You're erroneously presupposing that I performed it. The title remains familiar, however, but the explanation is more likely because I didn't say it is.

Play:

Say: Therefore I could not have "pissed" on your part.

Play:

Say: It figures that you would run away without answering the question.

Play:

Say: It's hard to figure out people like Doe.

Play:

Say: Precisely.

Play: