) interspersed
with diamond (
) and cross (
) note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
Alternate sections are marked Say and Play. The Say sections are spoken or sung to an improvised tune in a stentorian and condescending manner, as a traffic court judge lecturing a recidivist speeder. Read as though the text makes perfect sense, even though its grammar and meaning may make sudden, unexpected turns.
The Play sections use an ordinary five-line staff
with oval note heads () interspersed
with diamond () and cross () note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
) indicates some non-standard noise, like
a multiphonic or a strum behind the bridge or a dropped drumstick or a cheese-grater arpeggio or something else. Use your imagination.
) indicates a note that is one semitone (in either
direction) different from the preceding note.
You can play in concert with other performers, who may play other versions of this piece, or other any other materials, composed or improvised. When playing with others, the Say sections should be performed as disruptively as possible, and the Play sections should be played sensitively, with utmost regard to enhancing the performance of the other players.
Say: Note: no response.
Play:
Say: Irrelevant, given that you are not a concert band will not necessarily make it any less of a pontification.
Play:
Say: And the piece didn't have "Variations" in the same subthread as that someone else's message.
Play:
Say: Even composers can be perpetuated.
Play:
Say: What good would that do? I've told you to check out the irony to you, but it should be.
Play:
Say: On the contrary, it's quite relevant.
Play:
Say: Be my guest, if you saw me quote someone else, which doesn't change the fact that the brass bands are a troll? Amazing! Yes, let's show them all what you consider to be "masterworks". I suggest that people aim their fire extinguisher at the subject line, it looks like it's about Ed Casey's erroneous warning. If you trace it backward far enough, you'll find that it's about Monty Python. If you have chosen to support Pudge's notion that the concerto involves the orchestra, so the powers that be now have a recording of it by the solo violin part is played on the posting to which I made comparisons are both longer.
Play:
Say: Precisely.
Play:
Say: And how is a lie. My name has been that the trouble may extend to people who have heard of you. How ironic.
Play:
Say: Also irrelevant.
Play:
Say: Incorrect; the news reader had them sorted for me chrologically already, but I didn't choose the original discussion?
Play:
Say: Is that a long time ago! How does that make it "stupid"? You called the piece didn't have any trouble hearing the minor mistake by the large number of violinists in an orchestra plays a section of music is the non-OS/2 users that hang out with you and other kooks?
Play:
Say: The evidence that your reply was made.
Play:
Say: Repetition of a larger number of repetitions you think you can.
Play:
Say: Balderdash. You're forgetting that I was there just last August. I've seen the CD in record stores here. But for the main cultural event, the organizers of the Blast! performance in London. Yet another unsubstantiated claim.
Play:
Say: What for you would constitute evidence of my experience?
Play:
Say: Doe can apparently post his bait about anyone.
Play:
Say: On what basis do you call whatever is sitting in your desk chair "objective evidence"?
Play:
Say: Where's Wilma?
Play:
Say: On the contrary, the theme is not classical music.
Play:
Say: On the contrary, it's quite relevant.
Play:
Say: But they do need to turn newsgroups into your own behavior.
Play:
Say: Pretty much the same one that Rachmaninoff used for the entire ensemble, is quite irrelevant. Ironically, above you called this the relevant evidence. No studying necessary; just a little editing.
Play:
Say: I know that the Bartok is much longer than the one discussing music.
Play:
Say: "That many violins."
Play:
Say: Then what needs work is your looking back through previously read posts.
Play:
Say: Illogical, as antagonists like you don't realize how your statement applies to yourself is interesting, if not amusing.
Play:
Say: You're erroneously presupposing that it's "too long", yet I noted that it's about Ed Casey's erroneous warning. If you trace it backward far enough, you'll find that it's a pity that it's shorter than Bartok's "Concerto for Orchestra". Of course, I already have. Where have I inappropriately used "irrelevant"?
Play:
Say: Evidence, please.
Play:
Say: Illogical, given that I've been discussing the issue that Doe was discussing. It shows that YOU are determined to turn a page. Also note that the comparison is not something that has "little inherent sophistication".
Play: