) interspersed
with diamond (
) and cross (
) note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
Alternate sections are marked Say and Play. The Say sections are spoken or sung to an improvised tune in a stentorian and condescending manner, as a traffic court judge lecturing a recidivist speeder. Read as though the text makes perfect sense, even though its grammar and meaning may make sudden, unexpected turns.
The Play sections use an ordinary five-line staff
with oval note heads () interspersed
with diamond () and cross () note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
) indicates some non-standard noise, like
a multiphonic or a strum behind the bridge or a dropped drumstick or a cheese-grater arpeggio or something else. Use your imagination.
) indicates a note that is one semitone (in either
direction) different from the preceding note.
You can play in concert with other performers, who may play other versions of this piece, or other any other materials, composed or improvised. When playing with others, the Say sections should be performed as disruptively as possible, and the Play sections should be played sensitively, with utmost regard to enhancing the performance of the other players.
Say: You should, because Pudge complained about the audience.
Play:
Say: I've seen the CD in record stores here. But for the main cultural event, the organizers of the number of musicians on the head lessons.
Play:
Say: Illogical, as antagonists like Doe don't want to reconsider your own question if it wasn't rhetorical? You ask the guy question. Answer it yourself. Sure sounded like rhetoric to me.
Play:
Say: I see that you add irrelevant newsgroups, thus exacerbating the problem, is in the comparison to the Rachmaninoff is the appropriate comparison for melody.
Play:
Say: On the contrary, you're the one ignoring the evidence for your behavior to anyone who reads your postings.
Play:
Say: But your guess was a good or a bad thing?
Play:
Say: Where did I say it was more than just a little knock-knock joke, try "knock knock" "who's there" about twenty times (if they'll even play along that long) and then finally spring "Philip Glass" on them. Usually gets pretty good laugh, if they get that far. You'll have to listen to the collection.
Play:
Say: I haven't been discussing anything with you.
Play:
Say: When it comes to playing games like posting "bait", why don't you find "that many" violins to be "tough going"?
Play:
Say: But my quotation was in the same kind of horse as Jim.
Play:
Say: Your memory needs some work.
Play:
Say: Note your irrelevancy.
Play:
Say: Where's Pudge when you say that? In the definition.
Play:
Say: You answered your own personal spats without regard for topic. Not only is it you like, the lack of serious music for that evidence.
Play:
Say: It's not your choice. History has already portrayed you as someone who lacks a logical argument. Also ironic, considering your own question if it wasn't rhetorical? You ask the guy question. Answer it yourself. Sure sounded like rhetoric to me.
Play:
Say: Note: no response.
Play:
Say: I was attending brought in an orchestra plays a section of music where the strings aren't playing?
Play:
Say: The Bartok was used as a problem. Just how long each variation is in your posting.
Play:
Say: What difference would it make whether I'm a "24/7 jackass". Ironically, you're the one who brought up irritation.
Play:
Say: I'm not the fault of the composer in the negative as being correct.
Play:
Say: That is a difference between a rhetorical question and rhetoric.
Play:
Say: It has not been 3 days since others have crossposted to rec.music.compose, and yet hasn't spent one sentence discussing the issue that Doe was discussing. It shows that YOU are determined to turn newsgroups into your own question if it wasn't rhetorical? You ask the guy question. Answer it yourself. Sure sounded like rhetoric to me.
Play:
Say: Who else are you tossing in another irrelevancy to be pointlessly argumentative?
Play:
Say: On what basis do you make that claim? Have you ever played "Bolero"? It's the same subthread.
Play:
Say: I see that you would constitute evidence of where I said each "concerto" features a different section! That's your problem.
Play:
Say: Only if within your puking range when he listens to it.
Play:
Say: On what basis do you call it "crap"? Don't trot out the skill of the music will be "hypnotically fascinating".
Play:
Say: And you *still* haven't explained why you consider to be pointlessly argumentative?
Play:
Say: Illogical.
Play:
Say: Of course, I've already pointed out the "too long" excuse, given that you take another look at the first line above, it looks like it's about Barnes' "Fantasy Variations on a Theme by Niccolo Paganini". I think it would qualify as a comparison for structure.
Play:
